Imagine a big sheet with strings attached to the ends. Scientists call these sheets branes. String theory only makes sense if our world is made up of more than just 3 dimensions.
Our 3 dimensional world has a front and back, a left and right and an up and down. Scientists say we may live on a 3 dimensional sheet or brane and it might be possible that there are other dimensions that are a attached to that brane that we can't see. In fact scientists believe there could be another 6 dimensions and that black holes could be a way we could travel to them! One of the main concepts of string theory is supersymmetry. Another misunderstanding is that earlier physical scientists, including chemists, have already explained the world.
This leads to the misunderstanding that string theorists began making strange hypotheses after they became unaccountably "set free from truth". Newton's law of universal gravitation UG , added to the three Galilean laws of motion and some other presumptions, was published in Newton's theory successfully modeled interactions among objects of a size we can see, a range of phenomena now called the classical realm. Coulomb's law modeled electric attraction.
Maxwell 's electromagnetic field theory unified electricity and magnetism , while optics emerged from this field. Light's speed remained about the same when measured by an observer traveling in its field, however, although addition of velocities predicted the field to be slower or faster relative to the observer traveling with or against it. So, versus the electromagnetic field, the observer kept losing speed. By law of inertia , when no force is applied to an object, the object holds its velocity , which is speed and direction.
An object either in uniform motion , which is constant speed in an unchanging direction, or staying at rest, which is zero velocity, experiences inertia. This exhibits Galilean invariance—its mechanical interactions proceeding without variation—also called Galilean relativity since one cannot perceive whether one is at rest or in uniform motion.
In , Einstein's special theory of relativity explained the accuracy of both Maxwell's electromagnetic field and Galilean relativity by stating that the field's speed is absolute—a universal constant—whereas both space and time are local phenomena relative to the object's energy.
Thus, an object in relative motion shortens along the direction of its momentum Lorentz contraction , and its unfolding of events slows time dilation. A passenger on the object cannot detect the change, as all measuring devices aboard that vehicle have experienced length contraction and time dilation.
Only an external observer experiencing relative rest measures the object in relative motion to be shortened along its travel pathway and its events slowed. Special relativity left Newton's theory—which states space and time as absolute —unable to explain gravitation. By the equivalence principle , Einstein inferred that being under either gravitation or constant acceleration are indistinguishable experiences that might share a physical mechanism.
The suggested mechanism was progressive length contraction and time dilation—a consequence of the local energy density within 3D space—establishing a progressive tension within a rigid object, relieving its tension by moving toward the location of greatest energy density. Special relativity would be a limited case of a gravitational field. Special relativity would apply when the energy density across 3D space is uniform, and so the gravitational field is scaled uniformly from location to location, why an object experiences no acceleration and thus no gravitation.
In , Einstein's general theory of relativity newly explained gravitation with 4D spacetime modeled as a Lorentzian manifold. Time is one dimension merged with the three space dimensions, as every event in 3D space—2D horizontally and 1D vertically—entails a point along a 1D time axis. Even in everyday life, one states or implies both.
By omitting or missing the time coordinate, one arrives at the correct location in space when the sought event is absent—it is in the past or future at perhaps PM or AM.
By converging space and time and presuming both relative to the energy density in the vicinity, and by setting the only constant or absolute as not even mass but as light speed in a vacuum, general relativity revealed the natural world's previously unimagined balance and symmetry.
An object at light speed in a vacuum is moving at maximal rate through 3D space but exhibits no evolution of events—it is frozen in time—whereas an object motionless in 3D space flows fully along 1D time, experiencing the maximal rate of events' unfolding.
The popularized notion that relative in Einstein's theory suggests subjective or arbitrary was to some regret of Einstein, who later thought he ought have to named it general theory. The electromagnetic field's messenger particles, photons , carry an image timelessly across the universe while observers within this field have enough flow through time to decode this image and react by moving within 3D space, yet can never outrun this timeless image. The universe's state under years after the presumed big bang that began our universe is thought to be displayed as the cosmic microwave background CMB.
In , the universe was thought to be entirely what we now call the Milky Way galaxy and to be static. Einstein operated his recently published equations of the gravitational field , and discovered the consequence that the universe was expanding or shrinking. The theory is operable in either direction—time invariance. He revised the theory add a cosmological constant to arbitrarily balance the universe.
Nearing , Edwin Hubble's telescopic data, interpreted through general relativity, revealed the universe was expanding. In while on a World War I battlefield, Karl Schwarzschild operated Einstein's equations, and the Schwarzschild solution predicted black holes.
More precisely, bosonic string theories are dimensional, while superstring and M-theories turn out to involve 10 or 11 dimensions. However, these models appear to contradict observed phenomena. Physicists usually solve this problem in one of two different ways. The first is to compactify the extra dimensions; i. We achieve the 6-dimensional model's resolution with Calabi-Yau spaces. In 7 dimensions, they are termed G 2 manifolds.
Essentially these extra dimensions are "compactified" by causing them to loop back upon themselves. A standard analogy for this is to consider multidimensional space as a garden hose. If we view the hose from a sufficient distance, it appears to have only one dimension, its length. This is akin to the 4 macroscopic dimensions we are accustomed to dealing with every day.
If, however, one approaches the hose, one discovers that it contains a second dimension, its circumference. This "extra dimension" is only visible within a relatively close range to the hose, just as the extra dimensions of the Calabi-Yau space are only visible at extremely small distances, and thus are not easily detected. Of course, everyday garden hoses exist in three spatial dimensions, but for the purpose of the analogy, we neglect its thickness and consider only motion on the surface of the hose.
A point on the hose's surface can be specified by two numbers, a distance along the hose and a distance along the circumference, just as points on the Earth's surface can be uniquely specified by latitude and longitude.
In either case, we say that the object has two spatial dimensions. Like the Earth, garden hoses have an interior, a region that requires an extra dimension; however, unlike the Earth, a Calabi-Yau space has no interior.
Because it involves mathematical objects called D-branes , this is known as a braneworld theory. In either case, gravity acting in the hidden dimensions produces other non-gravitational forces such as electromagnetism. In principle, therefore, it is possible to deduce the nature of those extra dimensions by requiring consistency with the standard model, but this is not yet a practical possibility. As of , string theory is unverified.
It is by no means the only theory currently being developed which suffers from this difficulty; any new development can pass through a stage of uncertainty before it becomes conclusively accepted or rejected.
Nearly 75 years after the puzzling first detection of the kaon, scientists are still looking to the particle for hints of physics beyond their current understanding. Hadrons count among their number the familiar protons and neutrons that make up our atoms, but they are much more than that.
Physicists deal with background in their experiments in two ways: by reducing it and by rejecting it. When observed parameters seem like they must be finely tuned to fit a theory, some physicists accept it as coincidence. Others want to keep digging.
0コメント